... and uphold, without publicly proclaiming the notional and ideological aspects of this phenomenon. What is this notorious “rule-based order” actually about? What “rules” do American and European politicians have in mind? How do they relate to international law and to the concept of a liberal world order?
These questions have been asked time and again by Russia and China, to which the U.S. incriminates the gross violation of the so-called “rules”. This is normally followed by strict “reprimands” and quite material sanctions designed ...
... confrontation between Russia and the West and the United States with China. Should the aggravation of these crises be avoided, then the world system will either come to a bipolar system dominated by the United States and China or to a truly multipolar world order.
RIAC members also took part in the first day of the forum: Evgeny Primakov, Head of Rossotrudnichestvo; Sergey Stepashin, Chairman, Association of Lawyers of Russia; Victor Blazheev, the Rector of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL); ...
... extremely interesting and thought-provoking article, Andrey Kortunov identifies the three main components of the “liberal world order”: rationality, normativity and openness. While in my opinion, not a single manifestation of human activity, ... ... question. Fortunately, it is not that black and white: for example, almost the entire Nuremberg process was built on customary international law, as the Geneva Convention of 1929 did not apply to a number of the conflicting parties in World War II.
Why ...
