Analytical articles
Trade appears to be the weak link in the new multilateral initiative as the U.S. is reluctant to take on clear commitments to open markets
ShortThe West’s anti-China rhetoric and the idea of mounting NATO presence in the Indo-Pacific meet with a critical reception from most Asian states
ShortOne can still hope that the South Korean administration will simply “keep its head down,” avoiding any drastic steps, acting reactively, playing it by ear
ShortIt appears that the Biden administration is not ready for a real showdown with Beijing over the Taiwan question
ShortDecisions made by NATO may be unpalatable for Moscow, but they are generally consistent and predictable. The same cannot be said of structures such as AUKUS
ShortUnless the partnership falls apart for some reason in years to come, AUKUS may well mark a watershed
ShortApparently, the Biden administration is willing to boost U.S. military presence in the Indo-Pacific notwithstanding the declared defense budget austerity
ShortThe factors driving the Indo-Pacific strategy forward are clearly stronger than the constraints
ShortRussia did not stand aloof when the global development trends pointed towards the West. We can’t help being part of the global pendulum’s movement in the opposite direction
ShortSummits of the Key Institutions in the Asia Pacific and their Outcomes
ShortPoll conducted
-
In your opinion, what are the US long-term goals for Russia?
U.S. wants to establish partnership relations with Russia on condition that it meets the U.S. requirements 33 (31%) U.S. wants to deter Russia’s military and political activity 30 (28%) U.S. wants to dissolve Russia 24 (22%) U.S. wants to establish alliance relations with Russia under the US conditions to rival China 21 (19%)